• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • RSS
  • Twitter
Huntsville Doppler

Huntsville Doppler

Read Local

  • Home
    • All Stories
    • Community Guidelines
    • Get in touch
    • Advertise with us!
  • News
  • Community
  • Commentary
    • Letters
  • Business
    • Professionally Speaking
    • Real Estate
  • Sports
  • Obituaries
  • Public Notices
  • Lifestyle
    • Art Fx
    • Contests and Deals
    • Arts, Culture, and Entertainment
    • It’s All Good
    • Wayback Wednesday
  • Events
    • Event Listings
    • Add Your Event
  • Speak Up, Huntsville!
  • Subscribe
  • Donate
  • South Muskoka
You are here: Home / News / Planning committee gives new owners of former Huntsville Haven subdivision green light for revised plan
New owner of former Huntsville Haven lands (in red) gets planning approval from Huntsville's planning committee for a revised plan of subdivision, pending conditions.

Planning committee gives new owners of former Huntsville Haven subdivision green light for revised plan

By Tamara de la Vega On May 18, 2021 News

Share on Facebook
Facebook
Tweet about this on Twitter
Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
Linkedin
Email this to someone
email
Print this page
Print
 
This post is more than one year old and may no longer be relevant. Please view this content with its age in mind.

 

The north end of Huntsville’s urban area is becoming a busy place with a number of new developments in the works—Rayville Developments (Woodstream) Inc. (formerly Huntsville Haven), as well as the Earls Road, Vista, and Greystone developments.

The new developer of the former Huntsville Haven development property, Andrew Kidd, and his planning consultant Celeste Phillips were before Huntsville’s planning committee at its May 12 remote meeting with an amendment to the proposed subdivision now being referred to as Rayville Developments (Woodstream) Inc. in the municipality’s planning report.

The site has an area of 19.774 hectares (48.86 acres) and is located west of Muskoka Road 3 North. In June 2015, under the name Huntsville Haven, the lands received planning approvals for a residential subdivision.

Phillips noted during the meeting that Huntsville Haven subdivision had been draft approved for 260 residential units which included townhouses. She said the revised plan is proposing a total of 225 units, and while the Huntsville Haven proposal called for 74 townhouses, the revised plan is now calling for 85 townhouses.

The revised plan for the subdivision was lauded by planning staff as a much better plan for the property, with additional green spaces and greater connectivity.

Proposed changes include moving the townhouses from the western end of the property to the centre, thereby concentrating the higher density portion of the development more towards the middle of the property, which will be surrounded by single-detached homes and green space.

Staff also noted that while the previous development had a secondary access off Hibberd Road, the new plan would create a road that would connect with Muskoka Road 3 North, just north of Hibberd Lane, while the other access would be off Woodstream Drive.

The developer is also asking for exceptions to zoning such as increasing the height of dwellings from nine metres to 11 metres and increasing the allowed lot coverage from 35 to 50 per cent.

“The revised plan increases the amount of open space on the site and combined with the proposed sidewalks throughout the development, will provide for a connected park and trail system while protecting the sensitive environmental features,” according to staff’s report.

Concerns expressed by area residents included the density of the development as well as concerns that they were not notified of the proposed townhouses. 

Phillips responded by saying that the properties where preparation for development had begun had been posted accordingly. She also said that plans to construct townhouses had been in the works from the start.

Other issues expressed included snow removal, a significant increase in traffic, the various developments already planned for the area which would add significant density to that part of town, and some also questioned the viability of servicing those developments.

Huntsville Mayor Karin Terziano said the District of Muskoka was in the process of undertaking a servicing study for that area and said she had been assured by staff that snow removal was not a concern.

Huntsville’s Official Plan calls for greater density in that area as part of the urban centre. Committee also heard that the applicant was asked for an updated traffic study as part of the approval for the revised plan of subdivision.

“I really liked the updated plan around active transportation and parkland dedication,” said committee chair and Huntsville Deputy Mayor Nancy Alcock. She said the largest parcel of parkland was scheduled to take place in phase 3 of the project and asked Phillips how fast phases two and three would be rolling out. Phillips said the applicant was hoping to roll out the phases as quickly as possible but it did depend on sales. She did say that the applicant would be “quite content to dedicate that block… at an earlier time if it’s something that you would like at the outset.”

Alcock said she would. She said her fear is that an important feature like parkland is often left to the very end. “From my perspective, I think that needs to move up, if possible,” she said. “I think that’s a very important feature.”

Committee also heard that a collector road planned for the subdivision will also join with the Earls Road development as that development also applies for planning approvals.

Committee approved the revision for the subdivision with a holding provision pending the fulfilment of conditions such as:

  • The provision of adequate infrastructure including water, sewer, stormwater systems, roads, and transportation infrastructure is constructed or secured, and that the necessary subdivision agreement is executed;
  • A peer review of the Scoped Environmental Impact Study is conducted to the satisfaction of the District of Muskoka and Town of Huntsville, and any recommendations are implemented through the subdivision agreement;
  • A peer review of the Traffic Impact Study is conducted to the satisfaction of the District of Muskoka and Town of Huntsville, and any recommendations are implemented through the subdivision agreement.

You can find municipal planning staff’s report here.

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox three times per week!

Click here to support local news

 

Reader Interactions

5 Comments

  1. Wayne Sinclair says

    May 20, 2021 at 11:07 am

    No mention of affordable housing in this proposal, why not? If we don’t require developers to build housing that our young new families can afford then what is all this all about? Are we just building homes for the rich? For city migrants that have sold their million-dollar-plus homes in the city to move into, where are our children going to live? We all need to be asking these questions over and over again, where will they live. This has to be about more than making the developers buckets of cash, it has to be about everyone.

  2. John K Davis says

    May 20, 2021 at 11:15 am

    Was there any discussion at this meeting regarding a new school for that area at Golf Course Rd and Muskoka Rd. 3 . This huge increase in vehicular traffic in this area would certainly be detrimental to child foot traffic in that area. Has the Trillium Board of Education made any comments on these development changes and if so what were they? Finally is the highrise component strictly condominium units, or was there any consideration for this to be affordable (geared to income) rental units and if so why not?

  3. Ralph Cliffe says

    May 20, 2021 at 12:10 pm

    One does get the feeling that these decisions are a little one sided?
    Welcome to the CITY of Huntsville. There is big money involved.
    Local needs are not important. Affordable housing you ask!

  4. James Rockwell says

    May 22, 2021 at 7:33 am

    I would enjoy seeing these developers live in one of these communities for a couple of years as a requirement to build.

    Mr Kidd relaxes comfortably in his home on Fairy Lake while commuting back and forth to Toronto in his personal helicopter, all the while turning Huntsville into Pickering North. Just ask the residents of Golden Pheasant how annoying it is to be disturbed by landing helicopters at his personal 3-hole golf course?

    This town council and planning department has become a farce.

  5. Bob Vtech says

    May 22, 2021 at 4:16 pm

    “Quote.This town council and planning department has become a farce”.
    To think we we elected them to represent the people of Huntsville?
    Like any political group, once elected they do what they want!
    Must remember this next election.

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

Primary Sidebar

  • Recent Stories
  • Popular
  • July 15, 2022 31

    Councillor responds to criticism of Kent Park redesign

  • July 13, 2022 23

    Kent Park redesign has been completed

  • July 16, 2022 15

    It is time to call for the Town of Huntsville to convene a public forum on short-term rental accommodations | Commentary

  • July 26, 2022 14

    Huntsville BIA to purchase three umbrellas for Kent Park

  • August 1, 2022 13

    Consultant delivers Huntsville’s new brand

  • August 11, 2022 0

    Huntsville OPP discover body off Crescent Bay Lane

  • August 11, 2022 0

    District passes accidental water leak policy

  • August 11, 2022 0

    Hwy. 11 northeast onramp at Muskoka Rd. 3 (Aspdin Rd.) to close nightly starting Aug. 29

  • August 11, 2022 0

    MP Report – Bringing a culture of results to Ottawa

  • August 11, 2022 0

    Muskoka Hornets alumni help the Newmarket Hawks capture gold medal in Halifax

  • A Sponsored Profile (347)
  • Advertise (1)
  • Around Muskoka (3)
  • Art Fx (48)
  • Breaking (36)

Footer

About Doppler

Established in 2015 by a bunch of local news hounds, Doppler strives to be the go-to source for people wanting to know more about what is going on in Huntsville and the surrounding community.

We strive to provide local news that is relevant and timely. We also look to tell local stories that inspire, inform and engage.

Notice the persistent use of the word local? Our mantra is local. From features on local people doing extraordinary things, to local business spotlights, news and sports coverage, all supplemented by provocative opinion pieces on topics near and far, we are working hard for you.

Feel free to drop us a line at huntsville@doppleronline.ca and tell us how we are doing, what you would like to see more of, or to just say ‘Hi’.

Thank you for reading Doppler.

Huntsville Doppler – READ LOCAL
A division of C3 Digital Media Group Inc.

Recent Comments

  • Kathryn Henderson on Speak Up, Huntsville!
  • Ron Nairn on HHS graduate gets his doctorate in astrophysics
  • John Rivière-Anderson on HHS graduate gets his doctorate in astrophysics
  • Ralph Cliffe on Visits to Huntsville Hospital’s ICU suspended
  • Martin Mann on Kiwanis raises funds and food for members of the community in need through the Salvation Army
  • Anna Bertelsen on HHS graduate gets his doctorate in astrophysics
  • Susan Godfrey on HHS graduate gets his doctorate in astrophysics
  • Allen Markle on It’s Wayback Wednesday!: Huntsville Welcome Arch | Sponsored by Jamie Lockwood, broker/owner of Sutton Group Muskoka Realty

Copyright © 2022 ·Doppler Online, a division of C3 Digital Media Group Inc. · Log in
  • About
  • Support Local News
  • Community Guidelines
  • Advertise with us!
  • Contact