Council to fill the mayor’s position through internal appointment



In a recorded vote of six to two, Huntsville councillors opted to appoint their mayor from within.

The position became vacant when former Huntsville Mayor Scott Aitchison successfully ran in the 2019 federal election and became this riding’s Member of Parliament.

In a majority vote, Huntsville council directed the municipal clerk, Tanya Calleja,  to ask councillors interested in the position to submit their interest in writing. The names will then be considered for an appointment at Huntsville’s December 17, 2019 council meeting.

Councillor Brian Thompson kicked off the discussion by saying he’d be in favour of appointing the mayor from the existing council members. He said if council were to opt for a byelection in order to fill the mayor’s position, it could potentially result in three byelections, which could take a lot of time and money.

“The argument that council, as we’re sitting here today, would not be responsible in making this kind of a decision, I think it doesn’t hold water with me, I think that’s what we’re elected for,” argued Thompson.

Councillor Nancy Alcock was also in support of filling the position from one of the current council members. “We have a number of people around this table who I think would be excellent mayors and we have at least two of them who… have expressed some interest in that so, again, we’re fortunate. Not all councils would have that opportunity.”

She said her concern with a byelection is that with a new administration, or a new mayor, the direction agreed to by council at the beginning of its current mandate would be put on “a hold zone… while we go through this process… I believe since the last election we’ve got a very solid mandate.”

“I happen to have a different view,” said Councillor Tim Withey. He said he supports a byelection and, contrary to Councillor Alcock, said he did not believe that a “closed group should make a decision like this and there’s still plenty of time,” he noted.

“That would be kind of the main issue for me is the time left on the clock. If we were discussing this decision with less than a year left, I’d say let the Deputy Mayor [Karin Terziano] ride it out but there’s too much time, it’s just over three years that would be left. Three years was the entire mandate ten years ago,” he said, adding that while council considers the options, “I think we must consider three pillars of our democracy, which are accountability, legitimacy, and transparency,” said Withey who called for a free and fair election for the position of mayor. Withey also argued that by going with an election process, “every elected official would be mindful of their responsibility to the people who put them there.”

Councillor Jonathan Wiebe said he shared the view of councillors Thompson and Alcock in preferring to appoint the mayor from the existing council. “I believe that within us we have very capable members that could fill this role and much the way Councillor Withey spoke to fulfilling the wishes of their constituents, in all the discussions I’ve had, as I do with most big decisions, I reach out to my constituents.” He said he had spoken to almost 100 people and the majority indicated they’d support “to appoint within our ranks. So I’m going to represent my constituents the best way I know how to, and I’m going to vote for that option.”

Councillor Jason FitzGerald said it was a difficult decision. “Much like Councillor Wiebe, I’ve reached out to my constituents and the resounding answer from my constituents is they respect the decisions that I make on their behalf and they put me in this position to make those decisions, regardless of the magnitude of the decision. Out of everyone I’ve talked to two people suggested that we have a byelection, and I’m well over 500 people I’ve discussed this with… the resounding answer from them is option A [to appoint a member to fill the position of mayor from existing councillors],” he said.

Councillor Dionne Schumacher also voted in favour of appointing an existing council member, noting that it had been done before while also questioning whether having to revisit procedures like the appointment of committees was prudent.

On the other hand, Councillor Dan Armour, who said he had been sitting on the fence on the issue, said he was leaning towards a byelection due to the amount of time still left in this council’s mandate. “We’ll see what plays out,” he concluded.

In the end, the majority of councillors voted in favour of appointing the mayor from within, while both Withey and Armour voted against that option, preferring to hold a byelection to fill the mayor’s position.

While Deputy Mayor Karin Terziano, who has openly declared her interest in the position, did not speak to the options on the table, she did vote in favour of appointing a current council member for the position of mayor.

Whichever member of council gets appointed as mayor at the December council meeting, their position will then have to be declared vacant and council will again have the same options to fill it, according to Calleja. Those options will include the following: appointing another member of council, appointing the candidate who ran for the position in the 2018 municipal election, an appointment from those interested in running from the community-at-large, or a byelection.

If the position left behind by the person appointed as mayor is again filled by appointing from one of the existing council members, it stands to reason that eventually someone will need to fill a council vacancy from outside of council — whether by appointment or a byelection.

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox three times per week!





  1. Waldi Frankiewicz on

    My black predictions came true.The town council scrupulously exploited the existing legal loopholes and opted to appoint one of its esteemed members to this position.Tim’s attitude deserves a special mention but it is an isolated case.Probably already in January the old council under the new leadership will meet to set up a short term rental office (STR). The flagship resolution of this council. New office.New office positions.Where’d the money come from to maintain this office (according to the calculations of one of the previous speakers, about 100 owners may be interested in obtaining a licence)?. Will the interested parties not exercise their right to hospitality (according to God’s law we are all brothers and sisters, regardless of our faith and religion)?. I wonder how they will be able to break the principle of hospitality that has existed for thousands of years ?.

  2. I hope Nancy Alcock will put her name forward She would be an excellent Mayor and the people of Huntsville would recognise the fact that the in fighting going on in the community and council would be neutral Please consider this option Nancy and all the councillors.

  3. I have known Deputy Mayor Terziano and Councillor Withey for a very long time. Although they both bring a different skill set to to the table I believe either of them would make an excellent mayor. They are both passionate about the town and the challenges we are faced with regarding our hospital. I believe the council we have will make the best decision regarding the upcoming appointment of mayor. Time to move forward!

  4. I would think that not speaking to such an important issue should preclude Ms Terziano from being appointed. If she can not be forthcoming about this, how can we expect her to speak up for Huntsville. Hiding is not a leadership trait. Give it to Mr Withey

    • Excellent point. Ms Terziano has a right to vote for the process she believes is best BUT she has an obligation to explain why. She appears to be following advice she likely got that if you can count to five, keep your head down, the prize is in sight. Paul’s right, it’s not a leadership trait I admire.

  5. Here’s an interesting scenario! Suppose there are three councillors who declare an interest: it can be taken for granted that each candidate will vote for her/himself. That leaves five councillors to actually decide on this very important position! Most decisions are made by a full council. Not very democratic is it?

  6. Time for a woman! Karin deserves it based on how admirably she has done. No time for Male egos to dictate. Give Karin what she has earned!

  7. Karen Wehrstein on

    Tell the truth, I’m surprised there wasn’t already a procedure in place for the eventuality of a mayor leaving the position mid-term. In the century plus that Huntsville has existed, that’s never happened before?

    • Elizabeth Rice - Doppler Publisher on

      Karen, There is a system in place. It is legislated through the Ontario Municipal Act. However, the legislation offers options and the debate has centered around which option to choose.

      • Karen Wehrstein on

        Good information, thank you. I guess I thought there’d be a home-made decision re which option already in place. I guess there is now, through precedent.

  8. I believe that if you really want transparency in the selection of a new mayor, when individuals are vying for this position, you should have a by-election . Elections are the corner stone of our democracy .

    • Frances Botham on

      Well said sir. But then there is a good possibility that the people’s choice will conflict with that of the back room boys! LOL!

  9. I believe we are a democracy and we the people should decide who will fill this role.
    I do not believe that an appointment from within should prevail as the Councillors seem to think as it’s more cost effective.

    Lets’s take a vote and let the people decide!!!!

Leave a reply below. Comments without both first & last name will not be published. Your email address is required for validation but will not be publicly visible.