20200507_091156

She Speaks: Universal basic awakening | Commentary

 

One of the first quotes I’d ever heard about feminism was the now-ubiquitous: “Feminism is the radical notion that women are people.” Concise, practical, and obvious only once stated.

I feel very much the same way about Universal Basic Income. Anti-poverty work is the radical notion it should not be unaffordable to live.

No one asked to be here. No one sent a text from the pre-existence ether to their future-mother saying, “All right, time to deposit me into this capitalist, pre-apocalyptic descent into biospheric and social collapse. Can’t wait to be told that flipping burgers is a bottom-of-the-barrel job right up until I’m the only one who’ll do it. Let me at it.”

And yet, here we are. Corporations extracting labour from our bodies in the same gluttonous, relentless way they extract resources from the earth. Corporations spending tens of thousands of dollars on prime-time commercials to ‘thank’ their workers, all the while suppressing union talk and refusing to increase wages or implement appropriate safety measures for their staff.

When we are motionless, as we’ve been forced to be, suddenly all this hypocrisy, which usually moves too quickly to place a finger on, is right before our eyes. The motives of the rich, elite, and powerful have been laid bare, and it is an ugly and frightening scene.

Minimum wage—when you’re paid this, you are aware that, if it were legal, your boss would pay you even less. Yet, this number does not and can not describe your value. That is intrinsic and no human forces can alter it. The number just describes a very cold calculation: it’s the amount that keeps you from thinking of anything else, not a single thing beyond survival. It’s the bare minimum wage that (usually) keeps you alive in Ontario.

Why should we have to earn a living? We did not consent to this, did not sign a contract agreeing to maintain this broken system. We were brought into a world replete with scarcity—worse, artificial scarcity. Purposeful scarcity, implemented by the rich to widen the gap between us and maintain control. If something is necessary to keep you alive, it should be free. It should be provided, without guilt, without strings, without judgement. Food, water, shelter, healthcare. These are the very basics of survival, the lowest bar to meet.

That is what living in a society is all about. There are no lone wolves, no islands. We take care of each other because we are each valuable and because we, in turn, might need care. It is sick and senseless to pretend that menial, unthanked, and dangerous labour contains the meaning of life. How many Marie Curies worked their fingers to the bone doing laundry for a living; how many Roberta Bondars and Nelly McClungs have we lost to overnight shifts at the pizza place? How many brilliant minds have dreamt up another way but were too exhausted to fight?

Of course, laundry needs to be done and pizza delivered. One of the most boring arguments I see against a universal basic income is the assertion that if everyone has their basic financial needs met, no one will work.

Would you?

I would. I find meaning in all my jobs, in fact. They provide mental stimulation, opportunities for growth, a chance to help others, a sense of accomplishment, exposure to different attitudes and cultures, feedback from my community and beyond, socialization with co-workers, and a change of scenery. A good job will do much of that. But would I want them to look exactly as they do now? Well, no. Maybe there wouldn’t be quite so many hours or there’d be more time off between shifts. Maybe we could double-staff more frequently, so we can keep learning from each other and so we don’t have to divide our focus as much. If I had a guaranteed income, I would still work—but I would also have more leverage to make positive changes, for staff and clients, because I wouldn’t be held hostage by financial insecurity.

Consider your own job. Do you like it? Dare I ask, do you love it? Could you have done so, if certain financial-based wrongs were righted? If your operating budget was boosted the way you know it needs to be, if you could get more training in things you feel unsure about, if you could have more time away to heal from the demands of your position, and come back renewed—then, could you love your job?

Or did you really not like it, or even hate it? Are you relieved that you don’t have to go there right now, or are you dreading the fact that you do?

Here’s what I’ve learned from my time at the shelter. My favourite question to ask women when I get to know them is, “What would you do if you didn’t have to worry about money?”

There’s surprised laughter—some have never even considered this before. Some speak lovingly of their hobby or passion. “I’d start a rescue shelter for animals” is one common refrain, and “I’d spend more time on my art”. Some wish they could help other women in the way the shelter supported them. Almost as a rule, women say they would dedicate more time to caring for elders, young people with disabilities, working with marginalized communities, even educating abusive men. Some just want to crochet sweaters all day while watching Jeopardy! and waiting for their bread to bake.

You see, people want to work. Everything described above is work. Our society depends on these actions, and some people love doing them.

But they want that work to mean something. They want to be appreciated, seen, kept safe, have competent leadership, be compensated fairly, and they want to be given the choice. We all do. The garbage will still get picked up and the doctors will still clock in. But we’d all do it with the security to pursue that which makes us happiest. To follow our dreams.

If that sounds over the top to you, I fear you’ve fallen for the propaganda. The very convenient line that you’re just here on this planet in this unfathomably immense and unknown universe in order to produce labour, consume material items, and die. That’s just the way it is, right?

Nope. Humans created this broken, oppressive system. And anything humans invent, humans can discard. We have a wealth of data at our fingertips that was never available to us before. We hear directly the rallying cries across the globe for a new, better way. There’s a connectivity, an unshakeable sense of justice that bonds us—again and again, systems try to divide the people, pit us against each other, play up false camaraderie with the one per cent, trying to make us forget we are infinitely closer to being homeless than having an income like Jeff Bezos.

No one individual earns a billion dollars. That money is earned by the labour force and it should stay with them.

With all this talk of minimum wage, I propose a maximum wage. Say, everyone—yes, everyone—gets paid between $50 and $100 per hour of labour performed, no more or less, and the exact amount is determined by the difficulty of the position, health risks involved, potential for vicarious trauma, etc. If you want more money, just work more hours—but you still have the same twenty-four hours in a day that I do. We both get a basic income, a thriving income, simply for existing as human beings on this planet. Maybe you want to work 80 hours a week to top up your income—maybe I don’t want to work that way and just want to write and learn to play ukulele. #yolo

And, remember, this is a bridge, not a destination. Money is a human delusion, a shared agreement that shatters when any real focus is placed on it. I don’t actually believe we need money as a concept at all in order to thrive as a species. Certainly not as the twisted, extortive flexion of power it is today. I think we can do better.

Really take the time, after you read this, to imagine what you would do if all your needs were met and you had a security net of a guaranteed income. If your answer isn’t “I’d do exactly what I’m doing now and I’d love it” then I would suggest you support this untangling of mangled priorities that capitalism necessitates and see what we are really capable of.

Come on. You’ve earned it.

 

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox three times per week!

 

Kathleen May (Photo: Kai Rannik)

Kathleen May (Photo: Kai Rannik)

 

Kathleen May is a writer, speaker, and activist. Her column, She Speaks, has appeared in the Huntsville Doppler since 2018. Her work in our community includes co-founding the long-running Huntsville Women’s Group, volunteering with Muskoka Parry Sound Sexual Assault Services, and her role as a front-line counsellor at the women’s shelter. Kathleen is a 2018 Woman of Distinction for Social Activism and Community Development. She was longlisted for the 2020 CBC Short Story Prize, short-listed for the 2019 CBC Nonfiction Prize, and received the Best Author award for her 2018 submission at the Muskoka Novel Marathon, a fundraiser for literacy services. When she isn’t writing, she’s designing a tiny house which she intends to be the impetus for a sustainable women’s land co-operative in Muskoka.

 

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

11 Comments

  1. Rob Millman says:

    As you know, there was a pilot project regarding basic income: Nothing whatsoever proceeded from this. Was it a failure, or more likely; was it simply opposed by the financial elite?

    I feel that (as an incentive to do some paid work), it should be set up like my pension. If I work, and I have, I receive 50% of those monies above my pension. The only problem is that these funds are limited to something ridiculous like, say, $5000. For the BI system to work effectively, the overage should either be limitless, or a significantly higher negotiated amount.

    Another system, which has been successful in all too few industries (who were willing to try it), is the “living wage”. Of course, it is considerably higher than the minimum wage; and it varies considerably, by geographical area.

    For some reason, I can’t get my head around the concept of paying everyone between $50 and $100 per hour. Why would anybody spend 8 years in school to acquire a doctorate, so that they could earn $100/hr.; while Grade school grads are earning $50/hr.? And what employer could afford these rates?

  2. Ray Vowels says:

    I wonder just how many people would go to work every day if they got paid to sit out on the lake fishing all day or do all the other things that they don’t have time for because of trying to make a living. My thinking is get a minimum wage high enough for people to live on and hold other wages to a lower level so the playing field is a lot more level. the way things work now with all the unions going for a percentage wage in-cress the rich get richer and poor slip farther behind. Years ago when they went for a wage in cress it was 25 or so cents an hour for everyone so things stayed about even. Now it’s a 2 or 3 percent in-cress so the executive making $100.000 a year get a big raise the worker making 20.000 a year just gets farther behind and this has been going on for far to long.

  3. Peter Darling says:

    When I was a child, I often used the argument to my parents- I didn’t ask to be born. You are responsible for me being here. You and life are not being fair to me.
    Thank god, it took a long time and a lot of hard lessons and work, but I grew up.
    Life is not fair, and never will be fair. I think we all know that.
    It is a gift, miracle or just plain luck we are here.
    We all have an opportunity, not a right to make our way in this world as best we can.
    If you look at life as a victim we all loose.

  4. BJ BOLTAUZER says:

    Great article, Kathleen. I love your every thought. Thank you so much for your insight and depth with which you analyzed the size and gravity of the socio-economic disease which is ravaging our society.
    And a very valid comment, Frank de Jong.
    I believe that the basis of the problem is the unawareness of the majority of the world’s population that we are all one; like small droplets making a big ocean of humanity. None of the droplets is more or less important than another. Unawareness of oneness is the problem. There should be no division or discrimination between races, gender, religion, and other illusionary differences in people. But there is the human Ego, which does not want to see oneness.
    Any country, desiring to be considered civilized, should offer free quality universal health care, first-class education for all, and a living remuneration for labour. Way too many people are allowed to hog more than they can possibly need or use, leaving masses in a perpetual state of ignorance (poor education) and dependence on charity.
    BJ

  5. John Rivière-Anderson says:

    Kathleen, your piece speaks from the heart of the matter, and Frank, yours is the way to bring radical change to the system, through the very practical application of Land Value Taxation.

    Naomi Klein, Maya Menezes and Avi Lewis bring their perspective to the issue in this podcast – a great listen!

    https://change-everything.simplecast.com/episodes/naomi-klein-coronavirus-capitalism-and-a-peoples-bailout-now

  6. Patrick Craig says:

    Communism then? Beautiful theory…….

  7. Canada needs a permanent basic income program, but people with jobs shouldn’t be asked to pay for people without jobs. It should be financed, instead, by economic rent capture.

    Economic rent is revenue from the rental of the commons, it is unearned wealth that capitalizes into the upfront price of land and resources, which presently benefits only the monopoly owners of these gifts of nature. Everyone has a right to their share, which makes it a perfect way to finance a basic income.

    Unless funded by economic rent capture, basic income programs will be self-defeating, they will become a subsidy to landlords who will raise rents to match the rise in incomes of the working poor. (Importantly, land value taxes cannot be passed on to tenants.)

    Additionally, economic rent capture benefits the economy by removing the incentive to speculate, leaving capital no alternative but to invest in the job-rich productive economy.

    Jurisdictions may choose to structure the BI as a payment to all or as a negative income tax or top-up toward a livable income so as not to discourage anyone from seeking employment.

    A basic income will reduce or eliminate employer costs related to pensions, disability and employment insurance. It will assist startup businesses, businesses retooling and restructuring, artists, gig economy workers and students. It will support people wishing to move away from uninspiring, unhealthy or unethical work plus will support part-time work and traditionally unpaid work such as care-giving, parenthood, community work.

    As an entitlement of citizenship, a Basic Income would instill a sense of national pride, a feeling of inclusion and worth.

  8. Tanya Sprathoff says:

    Yes. Our economic system is flawed and needs immediate revamping. However, I haven’t figured out how to convince the 1% who have all the money and power to part with some of either or consider a redistribution of assets. Perhaps a positive outcome of this pandemic, as we all pull together to help meet basic needs, will be a firmer vision of how to make this a reality.

  9. Kate Brown says:

    Spicey, indeed, and bang on. There would be so much more wellness and well being. People would be naturally more joyful and motivated to make meaningful contributions to. Existence. Thank you once again, Kathleen May for yet another thoughtful, intelligent and provocative piece of writing. Thankyou for putting this out there in such a frank, articulate manner. Huntsville is so fortunate to have you.

  10. Martha Watson says:

    Kathleen, this is one of the best articles I have ever read! It sure has sparked my imagination and my thoughts. Imagine everyone’s being able to live a decent life on a decent wage! Stress levels would plummet. There would be so much more lovingkindness. To work or not to work, that is the question…and it is a win-win situation. Please keep on writing!

  11. Terri Howell says:

    Exactly! We absolutely need a guaranteed income in Canada…..indeed in the world. The time has come and the time is now.