Steve Hernen (left) from the Town and consultant Les Ranta from EXP provide an update on streetscape design options in Partners Hall on March 3, 2020 (Dawn Huddlestone)
Steve Hernen (left) from the Town and consultant Les Ranta from EXP provide an update on streetscape design options in Partners Hall on March 3, 2020 (Dawn Huddlestone)

With streetscape project scheduled to begin next year, Town seeks input on design

 

With the construction project to make needed repairs to the aging water and sewer infrastructure beneath Main Street drawing nearer, the Town must make decisions regarding a concurrent streetscape redesign.

Downtown business owners and members of the public were invited to a community information session at Partners Hall on March 3, 2020 to review preliminary streetscape design options and provide feedback to the project’s partners. Anyone who was unable to attend the meeting can submit feedback online at engagemuskoka.ca until March 16.

About 60 people were present at the public meeting, many of them representatives from downtown businesses.

Steve Hernen, the Town’s director of operations and protective services, began the meeting with a reminder about where the project began: with public consultation in June 2018 that led to a design brief created by consultants The Planning Partnership. “That’s the guiding principle for this whole design,” said Hernen. “So when people say to us, you know, ‘why are you thinking of putting trees here? What’s your concept?’ It’s what the people told council they wanted back in 2018.”

EXP, the consultants tasked with bringing the brief to life, have completed about 30 per cent of the design work and are now seeking input from businesses, residents and council.

The goal, added Hernen, is to have a design ready to go to tender in September so that construction can start in 2021. “We do have some tight timelines,” he said. “We intend to be back to council the end of this month with some more information and we intend to be back to council at the end of April. Hopefully, council will be ready to make some decisions and we can move this forward. If we delay this by four or five months, it starts to cause problems for the construction schedules that we have to meet to get the project done in a timely fashion.”

Representatives from EXP presented three design options to council on Feb. 24 (see a PDF copy of the presentation here). Those options did include price estimates, but for the public meeting Hernen noted that “until we start to narrow these plans down a little bit more, we can’t tell you exactly what different items cost.”

Les Ranta of EXP provided an overview of some of the items the design team was particularly interested in gathering feedback on. Among those were flexible parking—the ability to take parallel parking spots along Main Street and temporarily use those areas for events or seasonal patios—and pedestrian crossings from King Street across to Civic Square in front of the Algonquin Theatre as well as at West Street; ‘Muskoka Moments’ design additions which could include seating, trees and other vegetation; a rejuvenation of Kent Park, at the corner of Brunel Road and Main Street, which could include a water feature, spaces for resting or meeting, and an information kiosk that could be removed during events; and, finally, a new gateway feature at Lorne Street that could be a landmark at the western entrance to downtown.

Downtown Huntsville BIA manager, Morgan Richter, said that the organization will be launching a communications plan and branding strategy before this summer to ensure details about the project are shared with local businesses and residents and that both residents and visitors are encouraged to visit downtown during the construction.

Following the presentation (see a PDF copy of the slideshow here), attendees had the opportunity to view large-scale drawings as well as ask questions and provide feedback to Town staff and consultants. Several members of council were in attendance as well, including Deputy Mayor Nancy Alcock and councillors Dan Armour, Jason FitzGerald, Dione Schumacher, Bob Stone, and Tim Withey.

Above: Some of the feedback from information session attendees about the area in front of Town Hall (left) and the corner of Brunel and Main (Dawn Huddlestone)

Parking was a recurring theme.

Hernen noted in his introduction that within a 10 to 15 minute walk of Main Street, there are more than 2,000 parking spots in public lots, private lots, and on streets.

Parking places in Huntsville's core. The inner circle includes spots within a two-minute walk of Main Street, the middle dashed circle denotes spots within a five-minute walk, and the outer circle includes spots within an eight-minute walk. (Town of Huntsville)

Parking places in Huntsville’s core. The inner circle includes spots within a two-minute walk of Main Street, the middle dashed circle denotes spots within a five-minute walk, and the outer circle includes spots within an eight-minute walk. (Town of Huntsville)

A representative from one local business is concerned about the possible loss of parking spaces in the downtown core through flex parking or a redevelopment of Kent Park.

“A number of the planning elements in the streetscape design include less parking,” said Nate Smith, store manager at Algonquin Outfitters, adding that comparing the proximity of parking to downtown with parking in a city like Toronto and assuming people will get used to a longer walk, “runs the risk of people just disengaging with the downtown area…and especially locals that already consistently say, ‘oh, well in the summer I avoid downtown like the plague.”

Smith said that every parking spot downtown has value to local businesses who rely on that traffic, and the turnover of those vehicles. “So in a 10-hour day, one parking spot will hold X amount of vehicles and on a low estimate that vehicle probably holds two people and they’re gonna spend forty dollars at your establishment on average and maybe another establishment, and when you start adding that up…I think the cavalierness towards just eliminating parking spots for aesthetics is risky.”

(From left) Councillor Jason FitzGerald, Nate Smith from Algonquin Outfitters, and consultant Les Ranta of EXP make notes about the streetscape design (Dawn Huddlestone)

(From left) Councillor Jason FitzGerald, Nate Smith from Algonquin Outfitters, and consultant Les Ranta of EXP make notes about the streetscape design (Dawn Huddlestone)

 

Deputy Mayor Nancy Alcock acknowledged that at the very least there is a parking perception problem, compounded by confusion and lack of signage about the parking that is available.

“One of the other things that we are doing and starting to embark on is the whole branding strategy and doing proper signage,” she said. “We’re going to have to look at parking, and whether or not we look at our strategy as how to tell people where to park or do we create new parking, I think that is a bigger issue… We as a council still need to have that discussion.”

She also said she’s heard the message both at council and from the public that the Town needs to “do it right”.

“My sense was that there was a consensus [when the options were presented to councillors] of this is a signature piece for the town of Huntsville. So we don’t want to scrimp,” said Alcock, adding that she heard a similar message from some of the attendees at the public meeting. She acknowledged that a revitalization comes at a price, and that council hasn’t yet decided how much it is willing to commit to the project. She also said that she’d be reaching out to business owners. “They’ll want to know that, at the end of the day, this is going to be great for their business, because it’s going to be pedestrian oriented.”

Councillor Jason FitzGerald noted some of the inconvenience that the project will create, but said that it has to go ahead.

“We know there’s going to be some traffic issues, some parking issues, but…we have to do it,” said FitzGerald, referring to the needed repairs to the infrastructure below Main Street. He added that if it were left to the point where emergency repairs were needed, “then you have no control over timing, no control over price, and no control over the finished product. If you have to do it piecemeal, you end up with an inferior result. It isn’t the first time this has had to happen on a main street. It’s something that needs to happen and hopefully we can make it work for everybody.”

Downtown BIA chair, Rachel Hunt, hopes the same.

“I think obviously our members are concerned about the challenges the streetscape is going to bring in front of their businesses, especially during the summer months because that’s what carries a lot of us through the entire year,” she said. “But I think, for the most part, we’re very excited to see the downtown get this revitalization… Think about how many more people are going to come to our downtown. So the fact that the District has to go under the roads anyway, why not take advantage of that.”

Hunt said that communication will be key for both businesses and visitors, “so when it’s all said and done, and it’s beautiful, the storefronts are still full.”

The BIA is planning events to help draw people downtown during construction. “We want them to come and see every step of the journey with us. It’s going to be business as usual,” said Hunt. “It’s something exciting and something to celebrate. We have a lot of old pictures in our stores and what our buildings looked like 50 years ago. It’s going to be neat to see the before and after as this happens, too.

“I think this is great for our town and for our community… I think it’s something to get behind and be proud of—that this is happening and that the Town is willing to put in the money to invest in our community.”

For more information on the project, and to complete the survey, visit engagemuskoka.ca.

 

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox three times per week!

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

7 Comments

  1. Hugh Holland P. Eng. says:

    This winter, we spent some time in Victoria BC. Victoria is not a big city and there are lessons to be learned here that could be applied in Huntsville. In 1866, when Victoria became the capital of BC, the population was 3,630. Since then, the population has grown to 85,792 in an urban area of 20 square kilometers constrained on 3 sides by water. That’s 4,289 people per square kilometer. The population of “metro Victoria” is 367,770 on 696 square kilometers or 528 people per square kilometer. Huntsville has about 20,000 people on 710 square kilometers or 28 people per square kilometer. Like Huntsville, Victoria is built on rocky terrain.

    In Victoria, parking downtown is either underground or extremely limited, and yet beautiful Victoria is known as the “garden city” and a “must visit” destination. It attracts about 8 million visitors per year. How did they do it?

    The evolution of urban Victoria included these important strategies: A pleasant mix of high-rise buildings with multi-level underground parking, low-rise buildings above ground-level parking, plenty of small parks, and an outstanding system of public transportation. We did not rent a car. Its actually fun to navigate the public system that can take you quickly to anywhere in the metro area, and you never have to worry about making a wrong turn or looking for a parking place. There are no subways or street cars. Busses easily accommodate people in wheelchairs and parents with kids in a stroller. Your cell phone tells you what bus to take and when the next bus is coming.

    Huntsville’s problems are not unique. Huntsville is now facing the same problems that cities like Victoria and Toronto faced years ago. Toronto’s Yonge Street subway opened 66 years ago. Where would they be today without it? The options for Huntsville are similar: Gradually remove downtown buildings to make more room for downtown parking, or gradually create more multi-level parking, or gradually build a convenient system of public transit, or a combination of all the above. Foresight is the key. Huntsville needs a 20-year plan that starts now to gradually incorporate all these ideas. Victoria would be an easier model to replicate than Toronto. It would be a good investment to send a council member, a BIA rep and a planner to experience Victoria for a week.

  2. Ruby Truax says:

    I agree with Nate Smith that Council is being “cavalier” about eliminating parking spots for aesthetics.

    Even now we have an acute shortage of public parking in our town. The numbers presented (750 spaces within a two-minute walk) are misleading because they include private parking lots as well, not all of which welcome non-patron parking. In fact, one of those lots is going to be closed to non-patrons this summer, which will be a loss of over 200 available parking spaces.

    Our four municipal (public) lots contain a total of only 150 spaces. Main Street and side street parking are the only other public parking available. Options two and three of the streetscape plan will eliminate the parking in Kent Park, and many of the spots along Main Street will be eliminated because each “Muskoka Moments” amenity takes up two parking spots. In option three, all the spaces in the “Town Square” area will also be removed, with the exception of a few handicapped spaces.

    This is a significant loss of public parking, particularly when we already face an acute shortage. Expecting private parking lot owners to take up the slack, and assuming that they are willing to do so, is, as Nate said, a cavalier attitude.

  3. Ralph Cliffe says:

    Downtown core parking for 750.
    Is employee parking included in this figure?
    Subtract employee parking and what is the true figure.
    4 million dollars to make downtown Huntsville pretty
    and our roads are a disgrace. Fairvern could make better use of this funding.
    Really makes sense.

  4. Debbie Kirwin says:

    I’m on it!

  5. David Bailey says:

    This town is definitely not “pedestrian oriented”. Look at the many streets in the circled areas that do not have continuous side walks. Two of the strip malls do not have sidewalks leading to them. You must walk on a busy street to get to them.
    The traffic light at Brunel road is also not friendly with pedestrians. The pedestrian lights signal “walk” at the same and only time that traffic from Brunel road has a green light. A similar “T” junction in Orillia does not operate this way and still keeps traffic moving all the time.

  6. I would like to see bike lanes. This town needs to take action to become more bike friendly and this is the ideal place to start.

  7. Rob Millman says:

    Great event: short presentations with lots of time to view exhibits and discuss with several knowledgeable people. I finally had a chance to meet Morgan Richter; and found her to be a very intelligent and engaging young lady.

    My major concern, as always, is that all the dictates of the AODA Built Environment Standard are considered. I understand that the province eventually decided on the wheelchair as the design vehicle (we had recommended the scooter); but even that smaller vehicle may have difficulty, e.g. navigating the tight spaces in the new Kent Park. It is possible that a job of this nature and magnitude would require an on-site contract manager with extensive knowledge of the AODA: If not, somebody else with a similar skill set may be required.

    We will never have a second chance to make a first impression. I urge everyone to come forward with her/his ideas. Too often, I hear grumblers after the fact; hardly fair if you made no comments originally.