G7-ed.png

What happens when the rule of law is challenged? | Commentary

“The rule of law and the judiciary is under attack around the world.” — Richard Wagner, Chief Justice of Canada

“The rule of law is endangered.”  — John Roberts, Chief Justice of the United States

Said another way, when you ignore the law, question and disregard the authority of the courts, and when political leaders prioritize their interests over those of the people they lead, democracy is seriously challenged, and it becomes a short road to anarchy. 

The best example of this, at least the one closest to home, is the United States. It is not a theory, it is not an academic debate, it is a work in progress.  

History has shown us time and again that the erosion of judicial independence and the undermining of democratic principles come at a steep price. Societies that fail to uphold the rule of law risk descending into chaos, where the voices of the marginalized are silenced, and power becomes concentrated in the hands of a few. This is not a distant threat but a present danger.

Let’s just take a look at the pattern of recent events in the United States that mirror authoritarian rule. 

Donald Trump won a second election as President of the United States  primarily on a platform to deal with illegal immigration in that country. Many Americans saw it as an issue growing out of control, increasing crime and endangering American citizens. It was a legitimate concern, and voters saw Trump as the most likely candidate to deal with it.  

All of that is fair enough.

But the manner in which the Trump Administration has gone about this is also a legitimate cause for significant  concern, going well beyond the single issue of illegal immigration and also allowing authoritarian measures to seep into other aspects of American life.  

Tactics by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers are, at the behest of the Trump Administration, ignoring, in many instances, the rule of law, raiding without warrants, concealing their identity, and deporting thousands of individuals without due process or proving that they fall in the category of illegal immigrants.

Once more in our history, we witness Gestapo-like tactics with people living in fear of a knock on their door in the middle of the night. 

Just in the past week, three young children who are American citizens, were deported to Honduras alongside their mothers. One of these was a 4-year- old child who had stage 4 cancer and was reportedly sent away without medication.  

Not too long ago, a member of Congress, Monica McIver, was arrested and charged with impeding and interfering with federal officers. She faces six years in jail. The alleged crime was protecting and protesting attempts to arrest the Mayor of Newark for opposing ICE tactics. 

Only this past week, a United States Senator, Alex Padilla, was evicted from a public press conference, handcuffed, and thrown to the floor by federal officials for shouting a question at  Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem. 

In Los Angeles just a few days ago, a sizable demonstration took place with people opposed to ICE and its tactics. Although both the Mayor of Los Angeles and the Governor of California insisted that they had the situation under control,  President Trump sent in not only the National Guard but also the United States Marines.  The result was a clear escalation of the Los Angeles demonstrations, soldiers fighting their own countrymen and women, and Trump sending national Troops into California without agreement from the government of that state as, under these particular circumstances, is required by law. It was a move, I believe, that one could argue comes close to a tactic of civil war.  

As well, it is hypocrisy for Donald Trump to label what was happening in Los Angeles as an insurrection when he refused a little more than four years ago to label an insurrection the massive invasion of Congress by his supporters, along with their threats to harm the Speaker of the House and hang the Vice President of the United States. There can be little doubt that Trump approved and supported it.

Finally, one cannot ignore the shooting and, in two instances, the cold-blooded murder and attempted murder of two Democratic Minnesota State legislators, which took place only a few days ago. The shooter has been identified as an anti-abortion and anti-LGBTQ, evangelical Christian, Trump supporter, with a list of more than 70 potential targets found in his car.

It is a fair question to ask if the situation in the United States is becoming chaotic. Donald Trump is pushing the limits of his power as President of the United States. He is challenging the rule of law, due process, and constitutional relevance.

 It is now becoming fairly clear that not everyone agrees.

This weekend,  while President Trump was enjoying his “Dear Leader” military parade in Washington (which sort of fizzled), more than a quarter of a million Americans marched all across the country in opposition to his authoritarian rule and a governance process that defies the reality of democratic norms. A lot of people, I believe, are recognizing that they are not getting what they voted for. 

There are consequences when the rule of law is ignored or when it is only invoked when it suits the powers that be.

International observers are expressing concern over the state of governance in the United States, with some drawing parallels to authoritarian regimes that have historically dismantled democratic institutions from within.

The international perception of America as a beacon of democracy is, in my view, faltering, and the effect of that could well be a reflection of the global concern that Chief Justice Richard Wagner of Canada has expressed. 

Canadians cannot ignore what is happening in the United States. Nor can they escape the reality of changes that could happen in Canada because of what is taking place over there. 

As this commentary is being written, G7 nations and their global guests are meeting in Alberta. Hopefully, Donald Trump will not attempt to trash it as he did the last time the G7 meetings were held in Canada. 

There are a myriad of issues and conflicts that need to be addressed at these meetings, perhaps with more urgency than ever before. These issues are too big and too important to let Donald Trump walk all over them with his authoritarian ideology. 

Prime Minister Carney as host and his G7 counterparts must forge an alliance, with or without Donald Trump, to effectively meet the challenges of the day, honouring democratic principles and the rule of law.

The stakes are undeniably high.

Hugh Mackenzie

Hugh Mackenzie has held elected office as a trustee on the Muskoka Board of Education, a Huntsville councillor, a District councillor, and mayor of Huntsville. He has also served as chairman of the District of Muskoka and as chief of staff to former premier of Ontario, Frank Miller.

Hugh has also served on a number of provincial, federal and local boards, including chair of the Ontario Health Disciplines Board, vice-chair of the Ontario Family Health Network, vice-chair of the Ontario Election Finance Commission, and board member of Roy Thomson Hall, the National Theatre School of Canada, and the Anglican Church of Canada. Locally, he has served as president of the Huntsville Rotary Club, chair of Huntsville District Memorial Hospital, chair of the Huntsville Hospital Foundation, president of Huntsville Festival of the Arts, and board member of Community Living Huntsville.

In business, Hugh Mackenzie has a background in radio and newspaper publishing. He was also a founding partner and CEO of Enterprise Canada, a national public affairs and strategic communications firm established in 1986.

Currently, Hugh is president of C3 Digital Media Inc., the parent company of Doppler Online, and he enjoys writing commentary for Huntsville Doppler.

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!

Click here to support local news

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

11 Comments

  1. Anna-Lise Kear says:

    Mr. Mackenzie, I can only add, along with most others commenting, that your remarks and observations are “spot-on” to the realities we are facing.

    In keeping with concerns about the erosion of democracies, I was wondering if you would care to shine a light on Ontario Bill 5? A recent commentary “Ontarians Have Just Lost Core Democratic Protections” (by David Crombie, Barbara Hall, John Sewell, Anne Golden, Ken Greenberg, Toronto Star, Thursday, June 19, 2025) is worth consideration at this time.

  2. nancy long says:

    Dictators don’t like to be opposed. Therein is the problem. Most leaders embrace open and diverse discussions and arguments.

  3. Allen Markle says:

    I can’t remember a time in my life when there has been a failure of ‘the law’. Failures within the law, sure. But we have always felt it or been aware that in the background, it was there. In my youth it seemed to be exerted as the essence of the law. Today it is applied more as the letter of the law, except when it comes to being applied by judges who seem to be pronouncing from la la land.

    But the failure of ‘law’ seems to be the prelude to failed statehood. The French government burdened the new Haitian state to the point that it could no longer service it’s people or itself. Haiti is on the brink of becoming a failed state, law being an impossible commodity.

    There are now other failed or failing states. Syria, Yemen and Somalia and some few others.

    In the ‘cowboy comics’ that I traded with friends, you were reasonably sure of who was the good guy, law abider and enforcer, and the bad guys. Simply by looking at their hats. Good guys: white hats. Bad guys: black hats. There were exceptions of course, Lash Larue and Hopalong Cassidy for example, but you likely know what I mean.

    Today, our southern neighbor has an arrogant, blithering, s#&t-show for a president. Someone the world is learning to neither trust or respect. He seems to believe that he knows everything and is the law. But by usurping the power of, and assuming the voice of ‘law’, he as destroying the very foundation of his country. Sheer arrogance.

    Even kids trading comic books would have know what colour of hat to stick on the man.

  4. Joanne Tanaka says:

    Yes, horrific events and its seems like the King of Chaos has oily fingers everywhere. Truly the Great Disrupter. I am imagining a fiery Tolkienesque dragon fed by hunger for power, revenge and treasure.

  5. Trisha Pendrith says:

    To Margaret Brown, yes, this is a commentary which provides the writers opinions. However it is a commentary based on (mostly) fact checked, accurate evidence on which Hugh has based his opinion. An informed opinion is good commentary.

    And to Hugh, your statement that a quarter of a million people marching across America needs an update. Many news sources have reported that more than 5 million people marched peacefully in more than 2000 cities and towns.
    Watching videos on many news reports of the massive numbers of peaceful protesters provides visual evidence of the impressively huge numbers of people willing to take that risk to try and restore democracy in their beloved country.

  6. BJ Boltauzer says:

    Great commentary and conclusion, Mr. MacKenzie. Thank you very much.
    Many in the USA (and in Canada, it seems) do not realize the similarities with Germany under the nazi party in the 1930s.

  7. Jo Cryderman says:

    Thank you, Mr. Mackenzie, for sharing the facts with us! As Canadians, we cannot and should not be too complacent about Canada’s future.
    Jo Cryderman

  8. Bill Bell says:

    So Margaret Brown. What is the other side ?
    Please feel free to tell us

  9. Tamara de la Vega says:

    Margaret Brown, this is a commentary. In other words, an opinion. If you disagree, you are welcome to share a different point of view.

  10. Margaret Brown says:

    Maybe present both sides not just one. That’s the problem today. One sided journalism.

  11. Pamela Smyth says:

    That sum’s up the unbelievable attempt to dismantle the three pillars of USA governance.
    Who would have ever thought that ‘the leader of the free world ‘ would make authoritarianism descending into fascism possible?
    All the more reason that Canada upholds our Constitution and Bill of Rights.