Home-Rafa-Jodar-ED.jpg
(Image: Rafa Jodar)

Province seeking input on the practice of Notices of Security Interest registered against properties

The Ontario government is seeking public input on ways to address and reduce the harmful and inappropriate use of Notices of Security Interest (NOSIs) against unsuspecting consumers.

A NOSI is a notice that can be registered on the land registry system by a business when it finances or leases certain equipment on a property such as an HVAC unit. In some cases, homeowners are not aware a NOSI has been registered on their title and businesses have charged them exorbitant fees to discharge the NOSI.

“Our government will not stand by and allow bad actors to take advantage of hardworking Ontarians for their own financial gain,” said Todd McCarthy, Minister of Public and Business Service Delivery. “We are consulting with businesses and consumers on ways to better protect homeowners and their property. Their input will help us develop a comprehensive approach to address Notices of Security Interest that will protect vulnerable consumers and seniors. This could include strengthening various laws to shield homeowners against wrongdoing.”

The Ontario government is also considering ways to clarify rules and obligations for businesses to discharge a NOSI, while providing enhanced powers to Consumer Protection Ontario to help homeowners when a business fails to do so.

“The current rules do not adequately protect homeowners from harmful and inappropriate business practices,” said Minister McCarthy. “We are committed to finding solutions to this important issue that would keep consumers from losing money to unscrupulous actors while building a safer and stronger economy.”

The consultation, which runs from October 17 to December 1, 2023, will explore topics such as the requirement to notify a homeowner when a NOSI is registered, the types of goods or fixtures for which a company can register a NOSI, and restrictions on the duration of a NOSI.


Quick Facts

  • A NOSI registration is a common business practice that is often inaccurately referred to as a lien.
  • The Consumer Protection Act, 2002, sets out rules for consumer contracts in Ontario to which NOSIs may be tied. The Act governs most personal and household consumer transactions.
  • The Personal Property Security Act allows for NOSIs to be registered. It includes remedies in cases when a consumer has fulfilled their obligations related to the NOSI (or if obligations related to the NOSI are forgiven) but a business has not discharged the NOSI.
  • Ontario’s land registry system can be used to search NOSIs on the title of your property.
  • Learn your rights and how to protect yourself before, during or after you make a purchase.
Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!

Click here to support local news

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

2 Comments

  1. Brian Tapley says:

    Most people work hard for what they have. A claim against things like their home should not be taken lightly.
    It seems only fair to me that any kind of interest registered to their land, business or home should be clearly described in plain language and delivered by a registered letter at least several months BEFORE it is registered on any title, deed or otherwise.

    The entire cost of removal of the registered interest after conditions have been fulfilled should be born by the entity that registered the article and this should have to be done withing 30 days of the complete fulfillment of conditions of the contract. If the contract is paid off early, this should still apply.
    Any errors and their resultant damages or follow up costs should also be born by the registering entity.

  2. Howard Bargman says:

    A year ago I was about to rent a new furnace from Enbridge and noticed terminology in the contract that led me to question what the statement meant. There would be a lien on my house, but it did NOT use that terminology, or any terminology that might suggest the concept of lien to the unsuspecting consumer. Needless to say it was buried in pages of verbosity. Very underhanded.

    This has been going for years and has been profiled on CBC Marketplace and for a politician to now say they won’t allow it, is poppycock and puffery. They’ve had years to remedy this.