Is there change in the air? That certainly seems to be the case across the border and in a less urgent way, one can see some signs of it here.
In the United States this week the red (Republican) wave widely projected by pollsters and politicians alike, never happened. Right-wing politics there moved closer to the center. Democrats held on to their narrow control of the Senate, and Republicans, while likely to win a majority in the House of Representatives after the agonizingly slow count of ballots is finally over, will only do so by the skin of their teeth and not with the runaway that was anticipated.
I think we can be sure of two things.
First, the back-room boys and girls, the pollsters, and the ever-present consultants will be busy scratching their heads and wondering what the hell happened, then working on a strategy to blame anyone but themselves, and finally looking for the sacrificial lamb.
And that’s the second thing. For the Republicans, the sacrificial lamb may finally be Donald Trump, and from my perspective, and I suspect from the perspective of many others, that may be the best outcome from these mid-term elections.
There is an oft-stated mantra that the only poll that counts is the one on election day. I believe that is right although the pollsters and political consultants would challenge that. Their jobs depend on accurate projections and sound political advice, although their qualifications sometimes don’t match the challenge.
I laughed at one definition I heard of consultants: “It takes two things to be a consultant, (you can also insert pollster here) grey hair and hemorrhoids. The grey hair makes them look distinguished. The hemorrhoids make them look concerned.” Sadly, I spent enough time in related fields to have seen a few of those.
But it is the poll on election day that counts and in this case, the turnout was large and the message clear. Surprisingly, it was not so much about the left or right on the political spectrum. There were no huge winners there either way.
It was, in my view, more a rejection of the toxicity and extremism of Trump-era politics and a statement that truth matters and that election deniers are wrong and potentially a danger to democracy. It was also likely a statement by many voters that they want to control their own lives. It was definitely a statement by voters that they want to see things done differently in the political world.
Over the next few weeks, members of both branches of Congress will elect their leadership. Their choices will reflect whether or not they have listened to the electorate and are willing to respond accordingly.
Certainly, in the past few days, there have been signs from elected Republicans that support for Trump-era politics is waning. A number are saying it is time to move on. Others, now that the midterms are behind them, may feel more able to move away from Trumpism to a more traditional and respected Republican Party.
Some folks are thinking outside of the box. A couple of House Republicans have floated the idea of Liz Cheney replacing Kevin McCarthy and becoming Speaker if the Republicans gain control of the House.
Not possible I thought because Cheney was not elected. But checking with an American friend steeped in political knowledge, I found that it was. Very unlikely, but possible. There is no requirement in the United States Constitution for the Speaker of the House to be one of its elected members.
In fact, I am told that at one time an idea by Trump supporters was briefly floated that if Republicans controlled Congress Trump could be elected Speaker, Biden and Harris impeached, and the Speaker, (Trump) being third in line for the Presidency, could move back into the White House!!
Unlikely scenarios aside, my hope and my belief are that these mid-term elections will signal the diminishment of Donald Trump’s influence over the Republican Party. Those that thought he would be an asset in these elections learned he was a liability. Many of the people he endorsed were defeated, especially those who supported his 2020 election denials.
It will be interesting to see if Trump goes ahead with his “exciting announcement” this week. If he does, and if it is a declaration that he will run for President again in 2024, it may not go as smoothly as he might hope. In fact, it may cause a civil war within the Republican camp. There are people waiting in the wings who may not be as afraid of him as they formerly were.
So, the question is, is there also a change in the air in Canada, when it comes to politics? Is there something we can learn from the mid-term elections in the United States? I tend to think so, on both counts.
As Americans have rejected extremism and toxicity, I think Canadians will too. The winds of change are different here, but they still exist. They are also less urgent as a general election is not upon us for several years unless the Robin Hood NDP stops propping up the Trudeau Government.
However, whether it is Conservatism or Liberalism, I believe that most people want to move back toward the middle of the political spectrum where there is respect for competing political viewpoints and an ability to find compromise when appropriate. ‘My way or the highway’ politics has not worked in the United States, and it will not work in Canada.
There is a federal by-election next month in the Liberal-held Riding of Mississauga-Lakeshore. They are running a high-profile candidate, former Ontario Finance Minister Charles Sousa.
Winning that by-election should be a romp in the park for the Trudeau government. If it is not, then just like the no-show red wave for the Republicans in the American mid-terms, it could signal a mood in Canada that suggests that the winds of change for a different way of doing politics are more alive and well here than some people believe.
We can only wait and see.
Hugh Mackenzie
Hugh Mackenzie has held elected office as a trustee on the Muskoka Board of Education, a Huntsville councillor, a District councillor, and mayor of Huntsville. He has also served as chairman of the District of Muskoka and as chief of staff to former premier of Ontario, Frank Miller.
Hugh has also served on a number of provincial, federal and local boards, including chair of the Ontario Health Disciplines Board, vice-chair of the Ontario Family Health Network, vice-chair of the Ontario Election Finance Commission, and board member of Roy Thomson Hall, the National Theatre School of Canada, and the Anglican Church of Canada. Locally, he has served as president of the Huntsville Rotary Club, chair of Huntsville District Memorial Hospital, chair of the Huntsville Hospital Foundation, president of Huntsville Festival of the Arts, and board member of Community Living Huntsville.
In business, Hugh Mackenzie has a background in radio and newspaper publishing. He was also a founding partner and CEO of Enterprise Canada, a national public affairs and strategic communications firm established in 1986.
Currently, Hugh is president of C3 Digital Media Inc., the parent company of Doppler Online, and he enjoys writing commentary for Huntsville Doppler.
Don’t miss out on Doppler!
Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!
Click here to support local news
Thank You Peter Kear for Your response, its always wonderful and a pleasure to read literature/information from a knowledgeable source. Please keep contributing, many of us appreciate your sharing of knowledge. As a former HHS student many, many years ago Mr. Kear was my History teacher, and I might add, a VERY good one. Thank You Peter
The enthusiasm for this ‘Listen up/ Mood for change’ has gripped the community. Well, maybe not really gripped. It seems to be that a good portion of the people who comment here, might feel much as I do. I’m trumped out. The thought of that loud, bombastic, rectum dominating the air waves for the next, however long, is depressing.
I find the reference to Trump as a sacrificial lamb somewhat distasteful, since I am quite partial to lamb; with mint sauce. I would like to know that our American neighbors have lost their taste for the ‘rump of Trump’, and find some other junk food; or maybe something palatable. Here’s hoping.
I can hardly wait ’til they finally manage to drag him and his mouth into their civil courts. May he spend the rest of his days and his money, trying to stay out of jail. That I would pay close attention to. I might even find that thrilling!
Maybe here in Ontario, this mood for change should be directed more towards the premier of our province.
Here is a man and his attendant herd that misrepresented themselves, not so much by informing, but by not apprising the voters of their intent. Did the herd not know this was the way it was to go? Never too late to speak-up.
In July, I got a 10% raise from the Feds; just for being ‘out of service’. But the people who support our teachers and school system aren’t worth a reasonable raise to the very man and herd, who tell us they want the children in the schools. Learning. These provincial employees face some daunting tasks, every day. A far cry from the ‘from time to time’ necessity of hooting and grunting and nodding knowingly, that our politicians are paid 150 grand a year to do. Plus benefits.
So: Hugh Mackenzie, I hope your comment about ‘my way or the highway’ not working in Canada. I would like to feel it wasn’t working here in Ontario.
I’m just not getting that feeling. Yet. But maybe we can both hope, eh!!
This is a ‘post’ in praise of the history of the democratic left in Canada, and a response to Hugh Mackenzie’s comment re. the ‘Robin Hood NDP … propping up the [Liberal] Trudeau Government.’
Non-wealthy Canadians and their families have benefitted a number of times from democratic left ‘Robin Hoods’ who as ‘agents of change’ pressured and negotiated one-step-at-a-time with federal minority Liberal governments over the last 100 years.
For example, it is highly unlikely there would have been an initial Old Age Pension in 1927 if there hadn’t been the parliamentary brinkmanship in 1926 of two independent labour members of parliament from Winnipeg – both had been imprisoned during the right to a ‘living wage’ and the right to ‘collective bargaining’ Winnipeg General Strike of 1919 – J.S. Woodsworth and A.A. Heaps, with the minority Liberal government of ‘Wobbly Willie’ Mackenzie King.
Actually, this first public Old Age Pension legislation was quite meager in nature. It gave ‘British subjects’ over the age of 70 and with 20 years residence in Canada a $20/month pension provided they could demonstrate in a means test that their annual income from all sources was less than $125.00!
The plan was jointly financed on a 50/50 basis by the federal and the provincial governments. If a specific province refused to participate in the plan with the federal government, the elderly poor in that province was just out of luck, and certainly the 1920s didn’t ‘roar’ for them! Such was the case in Ontario. The Conservative government of the day, led by Premier Howard Ferguson, refused to participate in the federal plan fearing the creeping influence of ‘bolshevism.’
And what about some of the appointed, unelected members of the Canadian Senate who likewise so vehemently opposed this legislation on the grounds that it represented the ‘beginnings of bolshevism’? If one of these elderly Conservative or Liberal senators had retired in 1927, he (remember, women were not yet recognized in law as ‘persons’ re. the Canadian Senate!) would have received an annual pension of $4,000.00! It was nifty annual income, considering the fact that 60% of men and 82% of working women earned less than $1,000/year in 1929 before the Great Depression of the 1930s. It would appear that the unelected senators of the day were still more interested in doing the wishes of the corporate plutocrats of Bay and Wall Street than addressing the plight of Canada’s struggling elderly on Main Street.
And yes, as lower-case ‘red tory,’ I give thanks each day for the political courage and personal perseverance of those 20th century Canadian democratic left ‘Robin Hoods’ like J.S. Woodsworth (MP), Agnes Macphail (MP & MPP), M.J. Coldwell (MP, and yes, Hugh, not a ‘Bolshie’ but a licensed Anglican lay reader!), Stanley Knowles (MP), and finally Tommy Douglas (MP & MLA), lest we forget.
Historica Canada’s ‘Heritage Minute’ on the 1927 Old Age Pension: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d3esCm4qLWs
Another play on words.
Interesting metaphor/allegory “Robin Hood NDP”. The legend is that Robin Hood in Merry Olde England robbed from the rich and gave to the poor. A bandit. One problem with that choice of allegory is that taxation in England Was for the Rich. Powerful, Titled and was an unfair to serfs, slaves, and even the landed gentry.
Meanwhile, we have a Premier who lives up to his last name, “Ford”. The brand name of vehicles: so many policy decisions associated with cars, trucks, gas, and highways. He can drive through and past the “crises” in Provincial healthcare and the environment without even blinking an ideological eye.
Thank you for your insight and reporting Hugh. Always a good read!