By Thomas Goyer
Waste Collection will be changing for some businesses in Muskoka.
At the District’s Engineering and Public Works Committee meeting on Wednesday, July 19, 2023, Director of Waste Management and Environmental Services Stephanie Mack outlined two potential options for commercial garbage collection. Option 1 is the end of all curbside waste collection for Industrial, Commercial, and most Institutional (IC&I) properties in the District. Option 2 involves the continuation of curbside collection only within the downtown areas.
The discussion around waste services is the result of legislative changes by the Provincial Government. In 2021 it was announced that the existing blue box program which is the responsibility of a combination of municipalities and waste producers would be altered. Now producers, companies responsible for producing household glass, plastic, metal, and printed paper products, will be responsible for both running and paying for the blue box program.
The District of Muskoka is scheduled to transition to the new blue box program in the fall of 2024. Residential waste will be covered by the new program, but IC&I properties will not be serviced under the new program. The report from District staff was before committee to examine options for non-covered waste collection.
Staff outlined two options for the future of collection. Option 1 is the cessation of curbside collection to IC&I properties. This option would require all commercial businesses and other IC&I sources to bring all garbage and recyclable materials to a District drop-off transfer station or depot on a fee-for-service basis. The option does allow for curbside collection of garbage, but not recyclable material for IC&I properties.
Option 2, which is recommended by staff, allows for continued curbside collection for IC&I properties within the Business Improvement Area (BIA) and Main Street Areas. This option also includes the use of District drop-off facilities on a fee-for-service basis. The staff report outlines that option two is largely designed to ensure clean urban areas within the District. The mix of residential and commercial properties in downtown areas makes a mix of public and private waste collection difficult.
In practice, option 2 means that the District will not be sending garbage trucks around the District to collect waste from IC&I locations. BIA areas will still be part of curbside service, but any location outside of the downtown area will be responsible for dropping off their own waste.
Committee members expressed support for Option 2 but insisted that mass communication is necessary. Muskoka Lakes Mayor Peter Kelley stated that there should be communication with local Chambers of Commerce to communicate the situation to businesses and allow them to decide on what works best for each business.
“You can’t over-communicate this thing. You can’t start early enough. And just get it out there and make sure everybody knows what’s coming,” Kelley said.
A key part that was outlined by Mack was the interest in having residential and commercial waste picked up on separate days of the week. This was due to the need to have residential and commercial waste picked up by separate providers. Having garbage on the street two days a week was a concern for some committee members. District Chair Jeff Lehman highlighted that waste volumes in the summer would make multiple garbage days problematic.
“I do think two days of garbage on the street is problematic in the summer, especially in the BIA’s where you’ve got a lot of mixed properties where the line between residential and commercial is pretty blurred,” Lehman said.
Another concern is that more waste from commercial businesses would end up in landfills. The new report does not outline what potential changes to tipping fees, the fees paid to dispose of waste at landfills, would be coming to accommodate the new program. Business owners directly taking their blue box material to landfills is a concern that staff is looking into, according to Mack. She stated that staff plan to investigate ways to track landfill traffic to see if there is an increase after the transition in 2024.
“We do not want to start to see blue box materials ending up in our landfill,” Mack said.
Lehman wanted it to be clear to both committee members and the public on the exact changes Option 2 would entail.
“If we adopt this option businesses outside of the BIA areas who have historically received curbside collection will no longer. And we are going to ask them to bring it to a landfill, and we’re going to ask them to pay for that privilege. So there is that double whammy for that group of businesses,” Lehman said.
It was pointed out by staff that many large businesses already have agreements with private companies to dispose of their waste. Businesses like grocery stores, restaurants, and coffee shops, would likely produce enough waste that they would have exceeded the limit on how much waste would be picked up by curbside pickup. Because of this existing dynamic, staff believed that there will be a limited impact as a result of the new policy.
Committee approved Option 2, which will be further developed by staff and communicated to stakeholders.
Don’t miss out on Doppler!
Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!
Click here to support local news
Government seems to be operating more and more by using the “art of the squeeze” on the services provided.
Things start off one way and then gradually they “squeeze” off the services a little bit at a time, year after year. I know it is a good idea to “reduce, reuse, recycle” but policies at District landfills do not really facilitate these goals all that well, this despite the best efforts of their front line staff.
Our taxes always go up on the excuse that “it costs more to provide services” but so do fees for the provided services. If the fee does not actually go up then the quantity limits get lowered, with the same effect.
Commercial properties already pay a higher tax, (not yet Air B&B and that is another issue) and why is that? Maybe at some point someone noted that commercial operations often create a bit more waste and recycle items than a single household. This would justify in part the higher tax rate.
These same commercial operations employ people and bring income to the area. I thought that was a good thing but now these same operations get penalized by not being provided with waste services at all. So now they have to cover the cost of transport to the recycling site and then also any fees at the site for the material they have hauled. It is now just another thing that they have to deal with out of any profits they make but you can be sure that their taxes did not drop as Mr. Finch also wonders.
There is already a group of very successful business people out there who excel at this “art of the squeeze”. They are called the Mafia. I’m not sure I want our government emulating them.
For me it is discouraging. We spend years and a lot of time and effort to do the right thing, set up recycling, arrange a system of transport and all that sort of detail that works for our business and complies with the rules and goals of government and then the rules seem to change on a nearly constant basis in a somewhat random manner. Chasing a moving target is hard and more expensive. Changes need to work in the real world, this whole system is not just a theory, we all need to work together to make it work at all and constant changes make this harder to do, all round.
Nancy Long: In September 2022, the Ontario Land Tribunal ruled in the Orillia dispute that short term rentals are commercial. Plain and simple they take their garbage/recycling to the transfer stations themselves!!!!
The issue of changes in waste disposal is not limited to commercial businesses. Residential waste removal is also being impacted. Communities on Otter Lake Road and on Springfield Road are affected and I suspect that there are other locations as well.
In any initiative to reduce waste and create a cleaner environment, there are going to be impacts. It’s just a shame that our elected representatives at the Provincial, District, and Municipal levels have not considered greater flexibility when it comes to very different realities in existence for different places within the District. If they had, I suspect that we would have a cleaner, greener environment at a lower cost to taxpayers and with happier and more supportive constituents.
I wonder if the air B&B’s are considered commerical or residential….
I hope commercial property / business owners see a steep reduction in our taxes for this…ha ha ha.