Chaffey.png

Three storey building proposed for 11 Chaffey Street in Brendale Square

At their April 12 meeting, Huntsville Planning Council approved the construction of a mixed-use, three-storey building on vacant land with a civic address of 11 Chaffey Street.

The lot is located next to Cripple Creek and according to planning reports has an area of about 508m² with 16m of frontage on Chaffey Street. The first floor of the building is being proposed for commercial use with four, two-bedroom rental apartments planned for the second and third floors.

Because the lands are within the Brendale Square designation, development in the area is “not generally permitted below the regulatory flood elevation,” noted planning staff. To mitigate potential flood hazards, one of the conditions attached to the approval of the development included ensuring that the minimum elevation of doors, windows, and other openings in the building be constructed above the flood elevation.

Planning representative John Gallagher, who attended the meeting with the applicant, Edward Seagram Junior, said that some of the conditions contingent on approval were contradictory. He argued that the bylaw does allow construction below the flood elevation provided floodproofing takes place.

Because the lands are located near a former landfill, the applicant had to provide a D-4 study. According to planning staff, “Concentrations of methane were found in the soil gases. This condition is unlikely to change, although it is recommended that any building be completed with an engineered geotextile slab seal and some form of passive engineered venting. The author of the report also recommended a further geotechnical investigation of the fill material and subsurface materials. However, adverse impacts are not anticipated and recommendations are included within the conditions.”

Other conditions included a stormwater management report. Gallagher argued that the parking lot is already there and a full report should not be necessary.

He said the building would be good for that spot. “We think it will really frame the perimeter. You know, we’ve got other stuff coming with the potential move of Freshco that we’re going to have to keep an eye on that area, and let’s not see it turn into a food desert and keep the uses high in that area and there’s, you know, potential for that,” said Gallagher.

Seagram said from a business standpoint they are providing four rental units on a property they’ve owned for 30 years. “The only issue is with interest rates being so high, and we already did this D-4 study… we just ask that if this is approved, we’re trying to keep our costs down because if you run the numbers on it, it’s barely viable.” He said it wouldn’t be viable if it weren’t for the fact that they own the land rather than having to purchase it. “The end result is we want to provide this housing and it would help us too because, for example, at Moose Delaney’s, we own that plaza and that could, for example, provide their staff a place to live.” He said it’s a win-win and said he’d appreciate the Town working with them to keep the cost down.

In the end, the council approved the development with the provision that staff would work with the applicant to see where there might be some flexibility to the conditions imposed.

Renderings of the proposed buildings provided to Planning Council. The front of the building would be facing Chaffey Street.

To find the full planning report, click HERE.

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!

Click here to support local news

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

5 Comments

  1. Wayne Sinclair says:

    This construction is similar to beachside rentals with multiple flights of stairs in not applicable to an aging tenant. Hauling groceries or anything else up those stairs should not be allowed at all for yearly rental units as it cuts out all potential renters if not fit enough. Did no one question this??

  2. Cindy Rivers says:

    I myself see we are very short handed in most of our stores and restaurants but we can’t get people living here and paying ridiculous prices for rent on minimum wages. Even seniors are going back to work to make ends meet a lot us are barely getting by and we every thing going up our pensions get smaller and smaller. So we need affordable housing and I can tell you those won’t be affordable apartments

  3. Lucille Frith says:

    Love the mixed use and density. However, I did not see anything relating to an existing comprehensive development plan for Brendale Square, or at least a developed concept of what it might look like and contain – a mix of commercial and mixed income housing, including the necessary details to deal with a floodplain and brownfield (both in the town plan). I do remember much discussion over the years.
    Is Brendale going to be redeveloped piecemeal?
    All 4 sides of this building should be considered as part of the appearance of the larger downtown site – the backyard faces the central parking area so appearance does matter. Do outside stairs work as accessible? Perhaps they are an emergency exit with another set interior to the building to access from the parking area? Is apartment parking in front of the building capable of charging electric vehicles? Street garbage/recycling may be an issue with the sidewalk.
    Have a look at the drawings included in the Doppler article for more info. A good use of this property!

  4. Marcia Frost says:

    Im wondering the same as Alan.
    There are lots of locals who work dwntown, many dont have cars and walk or cycle to the local businesses they work at (oftn for minimum wage…and we NEED thm, thos jobs need to get done)….this location wld be wonderful for thm but only if the cost of units is under $1000/mnth (utilities included).

    I wish the govt wld give funding to peoole building actual affordable housing to make sure its viable for thm!

    Someone wrking fulltime makng minimum wage makes about $2,000/mnth or arnd $25,000/yr.
    Oftn u dont get the fulltime hrs but if u can this is the reality……its not a lot, esp right now.
    I recently saw a tiny bachelor (one rm and a bathrm) dwntwn for $1300/mnth + utilities, no parking spot, no outdoor space (yard or balcony)….not sure who they think is gonna live ther.
    Not realistic but the owner lives in Toronto so hey, why not ask big city prices right? Ugh 🙁
    Goodbye workforce

  5. Alan Perry says:

    What is the rent estimate on the apartments, are they even going to be affordable ? People that work at restaurants don’t exactly make a whole lot of money and rent prices can be astronomical in this town for most people that live in this town all year round .🤨