Our current Huntsville Council now has about eight months under its belt. There is always a learning curve early in any municipal council’s mandate, especially so when there is a new mayor, and half of the councillors are new to the game.
Mayor Nancy Alcock had previously been on council, but there is a huge difference between that and the responsibilities taken on when one ascends to the mayor’s chair. I know that because, in the spirit of full disclosure, I have been there and done that.
There is no “honeymoon” period. Council has to get right down to work, create a budget and deal with other important issues that were on the table before they got there. That is not particularly easy and sometimes mistakes are made.
Having said all of that, elected bodies at any level of government are accountable to their constituents, not just at the end of their mandate, but throughout it. In that vein, it is not too early to take a hard look at some of the decisions this council has made at this stage in its mandate.
Let’s start with the 2023 Budget. It resulted in a 5.29% tax increase. This did not include the $230,000.00 that was put aside as part payment for Huntsville’s share of the new hospital sites. Factoring that in, the real tax increase was more in line with 6.56%. Either way, it was one of the highest tax increases in Muskoka.
I can defend that. Huntsville is the largest area municipality in Muskoka. Post-pandemic there were also a number of issues that needed to be dealt with and a realistic budget had to address those matters. What is harder to defend, however, is what has happened since the 2023 Budget was passed by Huntsville Council.
Last week, a staff budget deviation report regarding the 2023 second quarter forecast was presented to council. It said that the Town’s second-quarter consolidated forecast shows an overall forecasted deficit of $91, 417.00 and that this represents a deviation of less than 1% of the total budget. So far so good. However, this number is based on the budget as it was passed.
Since then, in a relatively short period of time, over one million dollars of taxpayer’s money has been spent or approved to be spent on unbudgeted items. Here is the list of the ones I am aware of:
- $25,000.00 from the Art Acquisition Fund for a Request for Proposals for art installation in Kent Park (This may have been repealed recently);
- $5,000.00 for water access improvement at Camp Kitchen;
- $20,000.00 from working capital reserves for communication towers;
- $40,000.00 from the building stabilization fund for a meeting room;
- $10,000.00 from parks reserves for Fairy Lake Tyland Park;
- $53,000.00 from working capital reserves for Meadow Park;
- $12,000.00 from working capital reserves for Anthony Court;
- $25,000.00 from reserves for a climate consultant;
- $480,000.00 from fleet capital reserves for equipment repairs;
- $100,000.00 from human capital reserves for a new strategic planning position;
- $75,000.00 from the human capital reserves for a new position in the Clerk’s Department;
- $75,000.00 for a new Committee Coordinator;
- $56,000.00 to create parking at the Annex. (Next to the Library);
- $34,000.00 from the working reserves for staff furniture;
- $21,300.00 for new defibrillators from recreation reserves;
- $26,000.00 from the IT reserves for council chamber audio upgrades and
- $25,000.00 for a consultant for a Building Management Plan from council chamber reserves.
The question here, at least for me, is not whether these expenditures were necessary. Some of them may well have been, while others, such as adding three new people to the Town payroll, appear to be more discretionary. Not included here are two additional staff positions in the Planning Department that were approved by council last week.
The real question is why weren’t all, or certainly most, of these items contained in the 2023 Budget passed in February? Surely these needs didn’t all pop up after that!
The reality is that in seven months, Council has already allowed the expenditure of at least a million dollars more than they approved in 2023. In my view, this makes a mockery of the budget process.
Some have argued that because the vast majority of funds for these unbudgeted expenditures came out of reserves or dedicated funds, it was not necessary to include them in the budget as it does not affect the tax rate. That is simply not so.
A budget is intended to reflect all expenditures planned during a specific period, in this case, 2023. It is also meant to restrain further spending. Reserve funds are all taxpayer’s dollars. Leaving these expenditures out of a budget misleads people about the amount of their money that is actually being spent. It also ignores the fact that reserves are there for a reason and in most cases have to be replenished, (again with taxpayer dollars), when these funds are spent. Reserve funds were never intended to be council’s piggy bank outside of the budget process.
Another tough decision for council this year is whether or not to expend funds on a Pride, or rainbow crosswalk in the municipality. It is sadly a controversial issue to start with and understandable that council would be sensitive about the manner in which it is handled. The bottom line, however, is that it was not in the budget and projected costs are as much as $81,000.00. The two councillors who are championing the project did find this cost brought forward by staff unacceptable and will return to council after further study. I do wonder if another group with a similar request would receive the same consideration and attention.
Finally, there is the whole issue of washrooms in River Mill Park. I had a hand in the creation of that park and of course, I would like to see permanent washrooms there. The hard question though is at what price?
This is not a problem created by our current council. It is one they inherited but one which they must now deal with. A very generous individual donated $300.000.00 dollars toward the building of two washrooms in River Mill Park. At first blush, that seems like more than enough.
However, contrary to staff projections last year that $60,000.00 would cover the cost of installing the washrooms, they went back to council asking for an additional $270,000 to cover the installation. When you add that to the cost of the building the price tag has risen to $630,000.
Ruby Truax, writing in Huntsville Voice, gave a graphic description of this by showing six entire houses in Huntsville, either sold or for sale, each containing at least two bathrooms for amounts less than that. She makes a point that cannot be ignored.
Surely there is a different way of doing this. An unplanned and unbudgeted expense of an additional $270,000 is a really heavy dose, especially when you are already over budget by more than a million dollars.
No government, including municipal governments, can be all things to all people. There are times when you have to say, “no”. Our council, in Huntsville, is facing some of those times. They are, in my view, on the edge of being seen as spendthrifts.
There is a way to avoid this. All it takes is strong leadership and tough decisions.
Hugh Mackenzie
Hugh Mackenzie has held elected office as a trustee on the Muskoka Board of Education, a Huntsville councillor, a District councillor, and mayor of Huntsville. He has also served as chairman of the District of Muskoka and as chief of staff to former premier of Ontario, Frank Miller.
Hugh has also served on a number of provincial, federal and local boards, including chair of the Ontario Health Disciplines Board, vice-chair of the Ontario Family Health Network, vice-chair of the Ontario Election Finance Commission, and board member of Roy Thomson Hall, the National Theatre School of Canada, and the Anglican Church of Canada. Locally, he has served as president of the Huntsville Rotary Club, chair of Huntsville District Memorial Hospital, chair of the Huntsville Hospital Foundation, president of Huntsville Festival of the Arts, and board member of Community Living Huntsville.
In business, Hugh Mackenzie has a background in radio and newspaper publishing. He was also a founding partner and CEO of Enterprise Canada, a national public affairs and strategic communications firm established in 1986.
Currently, Hugh is president of C3 Digital Media Inc., the parent company of Doppler Online, and he enjoys writing commentary for Huntsville Doppler.
Don’t miss out on Doppler!
Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!
Click here to support local news
Bill Beatty says
You hit multiple nails on the head here Hugh!
It seems that wants are becoming the norm when it should be Needs .
Mac Redden says
$81K vs $7K for crosswalk paint?
$400K to turn green, inviting, Kent park into a barren, sweltering, tombstone eyesore?
That mistake has still not been corrected. A bit of art isn’t going to help.
$630K for two $300K donated toilets? Seriously? Entire houses are cheaper.
Rapidly approaching a BILLION dollars blown by the District? For only 12,000 connections? Do the math.
Just don’t complain about the District “Smugly Wasting Taxpayer Money” or your home may be blown up.
Coincidence? True story.
Have all Muskoka councillors lost their mind?
Drunken sailors are thriftier.
The District is the worst group of people our neighbourhoods have ever come across.
https://doppleronline.ca/huntsville/committee-hears-companies-refuse-to-bid-on-rainbow-crosswalk/?
https://doppleronline.ca/huntsville/kent-park-redesign-has-been-completed/
https://doppleronline.ca/huntsville/council-defers-decision-on-whether-to-approve-a-350-cost-increase-to-prepare-the-site-for-the-donated-river-mill-park-washrooms/
https://southmuskoka.doppleronline.ca/big-stink-district-tackles-multiple-wastewater-issues/
Allen Markle says
Quite a list Hugh Mackenzie, most of which people are well aware of , but some I find surprising. Money for a committee coordinator. To act as a buffer between the public and council? Flak catcher to insulate the elected? Also, an additional clerk.
Plus another hundred grand for a strategic planning position! Up ’til now it has been non strategic I suppose? Pretty much reactionary? More load for the tax base.
Council would do well to read the comments of Frances Botham and Suzanne Treadwell on Doppler, July 30. Frances outlines a few things that these new people may look into. Council could if they were inclined. Suzanne suggests “dealing with real issues…..” Amen! The book has been done on the tilting at windmills.
The 40 grand for a meeting room is a bit perplexing. Unless the echo chamber at the Summit Center has found occupants, there is the area that once held an extensive gym. About an acre of space up there.
Is the running of the town far too ho-hum and workaday for our mayor and council? You might think they would like to put a lot of gone between themselves and the legacy of ‘Tombstone Territory’. But nope. A donated two-holer and a rainbow to the fore.
Maybe they might watch the movie ‘Forest Gump’ and heed the catch phrase his mother told him. I don’t mean the cute little comment about the chocolates. Not the “It happens” one either.
The other one.
Erin Jones says
Government, at all levels, is the only “growth industry” that is apparent these days.. In a democracy, the government it is supposed to be under the authority of the people, through their elected representatives. Runaway government spending–especially for frivolous projects, at the direction of the un-elected, mocks the citizenry. Big govern
Allen Markle says
Sometimes ‘the Bay’ has a couple of Huntsville councilors on. To talk about the issues of the day. Since our radio is on in the morning, we listen.
After Hugh Mackenzie posting his ‘Listen Up’, Frances Botham posting a tentative list for the council’s perusal and Suzanne Treadwell’s suggestion that council deal with issues, I thought maybe I would hear some references to some of the ideas those people had proposed.
Such as, why we need more people to push paper when there seems to be none to actually do the work. Is everyone on stress leave? Is it too work-a-day for council to look into some of Francis Botham’s suggestions? What Other issues are council facing?
Apparently, for these two councilors, it is the same old s#@t, just a different day. Straight into another episode in the continuing saga of “The Huntsville Two-holer”. It could be done on live theater! For sure it’s an issue, but haven’t we heard it enough times? Find a solution. Aren’t there enough people to do the job, or do we need more outside help? Another advisory contract! Again!!
Then, further talk, talk, talk about the paint job. Good grief! Heard it. But then, a councilor drops the “hate” bomb. Just because I find something stupid, doesn’t mean I ‘hate it’. Maybe it’s just an aversion. I have an aversion to all this carry on over a strip painted on the road.
Are we being subjected to a version of “the Big Lie’? Where-by, if we are told something enough times, we will come to accept it as fact. It isn’t working. I don’t need a colourful cross-walk.
And those who say this coloured cross-walk!!!! will make such a difference, are just people. Why do they feel they need special recognition because of their claimed differences? Colour is a different, as is race and religion. So too is height, weight and taste in attire. Doesn’t make us special. Just different.
Those individuals will be as they are, just as I will continue to be as I am. We are different. I can live with that.
I have no reason to ‘hate’ their being different. The just are. But I do find it aggravating that, being as they are seems to be reason for continual proclamation. It has to be in my face. Ad nauseum.
And that’s not promoting inclusivity. Anything but!!
Thomas R Spivak says
And if your views do not align with the public forum or they are critical of friends of who ever provides the forum you will be censored.
Allen Markle says
I was talking with a young lady the other day, wondering why they were considering naming one of the ball diamonds after George Selkirk. Selkirk was a local name way back then, but young George left town before he could even throw rocks.
I’ve watched the old Merchants play; have seen Mculley and Rimmington pitch, ‘Newf’ Feltham catch. Watched Mr. Ruby play. He was always Mr. Ruby, even when I had children of my own. Some things just stick. I figured I was well qualified to say George Selkirk would be way down on my list of names for a ball diamond. No disrespecting the man, just not the name for a Huntsville ball diamond.
So I was a bit taken aback when the young lady said “Why not Wanda Lumley?”
“Hunh!!” Damn! Sucks when you have no idea what just happened and why that’s the best reply you can come up with.
I know Wanda Lumley. At Muskoka Seniors. The Agriculture Society. Tricia even interviewed the lady on her radio show ‘Touching the Past’. But baseball?
My young friend is more than a little bit up on local history . She even helped me look the info up. Reported in the Forester, Aug. 13, 1986. Bob McCulley, Stan Rimmington and Wanda Lumley were the sub-committee to set up the first two diamonds in Huntsville’s new park.
Not a jock jigglin’, dirt kickin’, ass smackin’ “good ol’ boy”, but this lady still helped get it all in motion. Right along with the men.
There are people working on choosing a name for a ball diamond right now. She was in there from the beginning, and if I might, I nominate Wanda Lumley. I think she’s earned it.
C’mon Huntsville. Let’s give her a diamond.
Bill Spring says
I’ve always questioned why George was even in our Sports Hall of Fame when there are other homegrown athletes that at least began their careers here and deserve to be inducted.
Allen Markle says
I imagine there is still the process of choosing a name for one of our local ball diamonds. I admit that George Selkirk was a hell of a ball player in the era of ‘white only’. But he’s just one of thousands born in Huntsville who never played baseball here. He left Huntsville, became an American citizen, lived and died in the USA and is buried there. Haven’t read anything that said he ever returned here, even for a visit.
My choice is still Wanda Lumley, a woman who lives in and contributes to our community. There was a comment posted, indicating that Selkirks’ name may encourage and inspire young ball players, but we draw inspiration from lots of sources. Why not from a woman who lives among us? Why not from a person who actually contributes to our community?
My original post stated “Let’s give her a diamond!” Still think it’s the thing to do. There are young women who play baseball too. I have a daughter-in-law who does. Maybe they may draw inspiration from the lady. It doesn’t mean they have to become ball players. Just good people.
So c’mon Huntsville!