world-population.png

Do we want resistance to change or new opportunities?: Hugh Holland  | Commentary 

By Hugh Holland

The first and second industrial revolutions ushered in the two biggest periods of economic growth in history. They also created the interactive crises of population growth and climate change. In periods of change, there are always leaders who focus on the growing pains and try to exploit resistance to change, and there are leaders who try to capture the opportunities.

We are now into the third industrial revolution. 

An exploding world population

In 1972, as the global population approached 4 billion, and an international think tank called The Club of Rome warned of the “Limits to growth” with over-consumption of the earth’s finite reserves of energy, critical minerals, and food. But, in just 50 years, the global population doubled to 8 billion in 2024.  

Climate change

After 200 years of the burning of carbon-based fuels (carbon emissions act as a greenhouse roof, trapping solar radiation that is causing global warming), the result has been:  

  • Sea ice and glaciers melting > rising sea levels > increased coastal flooding and storm surges
  • Higher temperatures > more evaporation > more precipitation and flooding in prone areas
  • Higher temperatures > droughts in prone areas > crop failures and wildfires 
  • Hurricanes and tornadoes are becoming more powerful. These storm systems draw their energy from warmer ocean and land temperatures, extreme winds, and flooding that destroys food crops and buildings. 

In 1989, after decades of warning, the UN formed the International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) with the world’s top meteorologists. 35 years later, some misguided politicians still deny the facts and waste precious time blaming inflation on their opponent’s economic policies. But 2024 had the highest temperatures on record with increased severity and the compounding of extreme weather events, inflating the cost of living, insurance, and taxes and driving the migration of people from the global south, disrupting the north. 

According to data from UN demographics, the population has already peaked in 63 countries with aging and shrinking populations. The global population is forecast to peak in 2085. Africa and the Middle East will be the most significant challenges. Extreme poverty often brings high population growth (e.g., Nigeria, Afghanistan, Haiti), and that often becomes a problem for many other countries. 

Population Pyramids of the World from 1950 to 2100 – PopulationPyramid.net

Continent / Country19742024Peak popPeak year2100
World4,000 8,200 10.300  208510,100 
Asia2,4004,8005,28620504,630
        China 900 1.410 1.420 2030630 
      India6201,4501,70020601,505
    Japan 113116128201077
Africa40015843,810 +?3,810
    Nigeria63237475 +?475
South America2104354682050379
    Brazil1072122192040163
Europe6777457502020592
    Russia1341441491990126
    Germany788484202571
Middle East370
    Egypt 40116201 +?201
    Afghanistan1242130 +?130
North America
    USA2193494212100421
    Haiti52891 +?91
    Mexico601311502060131
    Canada224053210053

Solving the interactive challenges of population growth and climate change seems like Mission Impossible, but with the global population starting to decline and growing production and use of unlimited and much more universally available zero-emission wind, solar, geothermal, and nuclear energy, we now have a chance to avoid both a climate and human catastrophe, “should we choose to accept it.” 

The immediate question is, who is best suited to lead us at this critical time? Do we need someone who is focused on resisting change or someone who is focused on capturing new opportunities? 

Donald Trump is leading a backward resistance to change that will be a major setback for the USA. 

Few leaders understand this complex jigsaw puzzle as well as Mark Carney.  He is an experienced and talented leader. He was a typical hockey-playing Canadian boy growing up in Edmonton, Alberta. He attained high honours in economics at Harvard and Oxford. He worked for 13 years in private sector finance for Goldman Sachs in NYC, London, and Tokyo. He served as governor of the Bank of Canada and the Bank of England. As Chair of the International Financial Stability Board, he demonstrated the ability to unite the world’s bankers in finding a solution to the 2008 global financial crisis. As the UN Special Envoy for Climate Change, he dramatically increased global investment in clean energy. Politicians who attack him with slogans and insults show themselves to be incapable of civil and rational discussion. 

He is clearly the best-prepared person to lead Canada through the dual challenges of dealing with the threats of Donald Trump and capturing the many opportunities in the emerging age of clean energy. 

Hugh Holland

Hugh Holland is a retired engineering and manufacturing executive living in Huntsville, Ontario.

Don’t miss out on Doppler!

Sign up here to receive our email digest with links to our most recent stories.
Local news in your inbox so you don’t miss anything!

Click here to support local news

Join the discussion:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. Please ensure you include both your first and last name and abide by our community guidelines. Submissions that do not include the commenter's full name or that do not abide by our community guidelines will not be published.

5 Comments

  1. Bob Braan says:

    Carney only just announced he’s running for Prime Minister and already:
    “The Liberal Party narrowed the Conservative Party’s lead to just 7%.
    This represents a significant shift since that lead was an overwhelming 25% in December 2024. The Liberal Party sits at 31.5% of the federal vote share as of January 22nd according to Ekos Politics while the Conservative Party still leads the Liberals with 38.7%.”

    Above quote from the story “The Liberals are on the rise again in Canada following Trudeau’s resignation.”
    Once again Cons, like Scheer, O’Toole and PP self-destruct just before the election.
    PP got his wish that JT step down.
    To be replaced with a candidate with vast financial and environmental experience from around the world.
    Prime Minster material.
    Unlike whiny career politician PP.
    Be careful what you wish for.
    The only time Conservatives stop shooting themselves in the foot is when they pause to reload.

  2. Norm Raynor says:

    Mr. Holland, my point is that I don’t agree with a system that allows an unelected person to become the leader of Canada. I don’t agree with a person becoming premier of a province or territory if they are not elected. I have no problem with Mark Carney being the leader of the liberal party. Mark Carney has a wonderful resume, but he has not been elected . Until he is elected (which he will be) he nor any other non elected person should be our Prime Minister. The way the system is now the liberals could select you or me as their leader and that would make you or me Prime Minister. Scary eh!

    So anyway I am still not voting liberal because I don’t agree with the way they have been running the country. I doubt if any of the liberal policies will change who ever they appoint.
    .

  3. Hugh Holland says:

    Norm Raynor, Danielle Smith became Premier of Alberta before she had a seat in the legislature. There are other examples. We should not deprive ourselves of unusual ways to deal with unusual situations.

    I’m guessing if you need your car fixed, you will go to a trained mechanic. If you have a health problem, you will go to a qualified doctor. We are lucky to have Mark Carney’s outstanding qualifications available to deal with Trumpanomics, and mitigation of climate change in a way that will produce enormous economic opportunities in and for Canada.

  4. Norm Raynor says:

    The real sad thing is that Mark (carbon tax) Carney could be our next Prime Minister without being elected. If he is selected to be the next leader of the liberal party he will also be our Prime Minister. This isn’t the first time this has happened, and I think it needs to be changed so that no one can be Prime Minister unless they are an elected member of parliament. He has had lots of time and chances to run for a seat in parliament, but he has chosen not to. That is enough for me to say he doesn’t deserve to be Prime Minister.

    So once again Mr. Holland I am going to cancel your vote…….and don’t be surprised if Singh props up the liberals and a vote doesn’t happen soon.

  5. Dale Hajas says:

    As usual, a thoughtful, insightful and well-researched article Hugh.